Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Advanced Integrated Circuit Process LLC v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, No. 2:25-cv-00324 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 24, 2025)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00324, Dkt. No. 83
Decided
November 24, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 49 OPPOSED MOTION for Discovery - For Leave to Conduct Venue Discovery (Motion(s)49 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion for Leave to Conduct Venue Discovery (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Advanced Integrated Circuit Process LLC (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 49). In the Motion, Plaintiff moves for leave to conduct “targeted and limited venue discovery” consisting of: three (3) interrogatories ; two (2) requests for production; and a total of three (3) hours of additional 30(b)(6) deposition testimony of Mick Hsieh and Nick Tsai, to be divided by Plaintiff among the two (2) witnesses. (Id. at 1, 5; see also Dkt. No. 49-3 at 1).