Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Clear Imaging Research, LLC v. Lenovo Group Limited, No. 2:25-cv-00240 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00240, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
March 31, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 17 MOTION to Dismiss FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS DIRECT, WILLFUL, AND INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS filed by Lenovo Group Limited. (Motion(s)17 terminated)
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Lenovo Group Ltd.’s (“LGL”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Motion to Dismiss Direct, Willful, and Indirect Infringement Claims (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 17.) Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, and the documents submitted in support thereof, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Clear Imaging Research LLC (“Clear Imaging”) filed suit, accusing LGL of infringing seven U.S. patents . (Dkt. No.