Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Resonant Systems, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., No. 2:25-cv-00090 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2025)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:25-cv-00090, Dkt. No. 57
Decided
July 24, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 18 OPPOSED MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (Motion(s)18 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (Dkt. No. 18) filed by Defendant Nintendo Co., Ltd. In the Motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay the above-captioned case pending inter partes review (“IPR”) of “both of the only remaining claims of the asserted patent in this case”: U.S. Patent No. 8,860,337 (“the ’337 Patent”). (Id. at 1). I. Background The ’337 Patent is directed to “improvements in haptic feedback devices” such as video - game controllers. (See Dkt. No. 1, at 1, 3).