Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC v. SK Hynix Inc., No. 2:24-cv-01078 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2026)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-01078, Dkt. No. 122
Decided
March 30, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 114 Report and Recommendations, 42 Sealed Motion,, filed by SK Hynix Inc., 41 Motion to Dismiss, filed by SK Hynix Inc.. (Motion(s)41, 42, 114 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant previously filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 41) and a Motion to Transfer. (Dkt. No. 42.) Magistrate Judge Pay ne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 114), recommending gr anting in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, and denial of Defendant’s Motion to Transfer. Defendant has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 121.) Plaintiff did not file a response.