Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Omni Medsci, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics, Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-01070 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2026)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-01070, Dkt. No. 163
Decided
March 31, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
dge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/31/2026. (NKL)ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 146 Report and Recommendations, 83 Motion to Dismiss filed by OURA HEALTH OY, 68 Motion to Dismiss filed by OURA HEALTH OY. (Motion(s)83, 68, 146 terminate…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Oura Health OY (“Defendant”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 68) and a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 83.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 146), recommending a grant in part of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss . Plaintiff has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No.