Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cactus Wellhead, LLC v. Cameron International Corporation et al, No. 2:24-cv-01010 (E.D. Tex. July 2, 2026)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-01010, Dkt. No. 101
Decided
July 2, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 65 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION for Leave to Serve Supplemental Invalidity Contentions (Motion(s)65 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant ’s Opposed Motion for Leave to Serve Supplemental Invalidity Contentions (Dkt. No. 65) (“Motion”). Defendant seeks to amend its invalidity contentions to include potential system art that Plaintiff designed. Plaintiff elected not to disclose various documents evidencing this potential system art until about two weeks before the close of fact discovery, despite having such documents in its possession and Defendant requesting the information.