Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Oribel PTE Ltd. v. Carters Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00977 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2026)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00977, Dkt. No. 90
Decided
April 22, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, Oribel PTE Ltd. alleges infringement by Carter’s Retail Inc., The Wil- liam Carter Company, and Skip Hop Inc. (together, “Defendants”) of claims from U.S. Patent 10,736,437 (the “’437 Patent”). The ’437 Patent relates “to a portable activity center that can be used by a child for participating in different activities.” ’437 Patent at 1:7–8. The parties dispute the scope of three terms from these claims.