Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Edge Networking Systems LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., et al, No. 2:24-cv-00887 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00887, Dkt. No. 117
Decided
March 8, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 66 Sealed Motion to Transfer
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC’s (“Amazon”) Motion to Transfer. Dkt. No. 66. The motion is fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 70, 72, 73. In the Motion, Amazon seeks transfer to the Northern District of California (“NDCA”) for convenience . Dkt. No. 66 at 1. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD A federal district court may transfer a case “for the convenience of parties and witnesses” to “any other district or division where it might have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).