Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Stingray IP Solutions LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, No. 2:24-cv-00868 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
§ 101 Eligibility Motion to Dismiss Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00868, Dkt. No. 61
Decided
September 24, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 46 Report and Recommendations, 23 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Motion(s)23, 46 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“Defendant”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 23.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 46), recommending denial of the Motion. Defendant has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 48), with Stingray IP Solutions LLC (“Plaintiff”) filing a Response (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error