Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

FlexShopper, Inc. v. Katapult Holdings, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00795 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00795, Dkt. No. 88
Decided
August 19, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 57 Motion to Dismiss; denying 58 Motion to Dismiss
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Katapult Holdings, Inc. (“Katapult”). (Dkt. No. 58.1) Also before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Upbound Group Inc., Acima Holdings, LLC d/b/a Acima Leasing, and Acima Digital, LLC d/b/a Acima Leasing (together, “Acima”) (collectively, with Katapult, the “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 57.) In both Motions to Dismiss, Defendants move to dismiss the above -captioned cases under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on identical grounds. (Dkt. No. 57 at 1 ; Dkt. No.