Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc., v. HP Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00752 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00752, Dkt. No. 475
Decided
April 23, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 176 OPPOSED MOTION to Stay PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,. (Motion(s)176 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Inter Partes Review (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Defendants,” or “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 176). Having considered the Motion and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Samsung filed inter partes review (“IPR”) petitions on all asserted claims for the asserted patents. (Dkt. No. 176 at 3). In each IPR, Wilus filed a request for discretionary denial of institution. (Id.).