Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Brook + Whittle Ltd v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00735 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 8, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00735, Dkt. No. 87
Decided
September 8, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
Order Adopting 80 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 18 MOTION to Dismiss
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BROOK + WHITTLE LTD, Plaintiff, v. NE STLE USA, INC. and FUJI SEAL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00735-JRG-RSP O RDER Nestle USA, Inc. (“ Nestle”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) (“ Motion to Dismiss ”) (Dkt. No. 18). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 80) , recommending denial of Nestle’s Motion to Dismiss.