Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Advanced Integrated Circuit Process LLC v. United Microelectronics Corporation, No. 2:24-cv-00730 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00730, Dkt. No. 137
Decided
September 30, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims for Direct Infringement and Pre-Suit Indirect Infringement filed by United Microelectronics Corporation. (Motion(s)15 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims for Direct Infringement and Pre-Suit Indirect Infringement (Dkt. No. 15) filed by Defendant United Microelectronics Corporation (“UMC”). In the Motion, UMC asks the Court to dismiss Plaintiff Advanced Integrated Circuit Process LLC’s (“AICP”) allegations of direct infringement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) because AICP “merely parrots the claim language . . . and fails to provide adequate notice of its claims.” (Id. at 1).