Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wacom Co. Ltd. v. Shenzhen Qianfenyi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:24-cv-00702 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2026)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00702, Dkt. No. 103
Decided
February 4, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Length
44 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 76) filed by Plaintiff Wacom Co., Ltd. (“Plaintiff” or “Wacom ”). Also before the Court are the Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 82) filed by Defendant Shenzhen Qianfenyi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (“Defendant,” also referred to by the parties as “Maxeye”), and Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 86). Further before the Court are the parties’ October 21, 2025 P.R. 4- 3 Joint Claim Construction Statement (Dkt. No.