Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Stratasys, Inc. v. Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00644 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 12, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00644, Dkt. No. 118
Decided
November 12, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 95 OPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File MOTION to Amend/Correct 78 Claim Construction Chart or Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Defendants' Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Joint Claim Construction an…
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai Lunkuo Technology Co. Ltd., Bambu Lab Ltd., and Tuozhu Technology Limited (“Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 95). In the Motion, Defendants move for leave to amend the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (“JCC”) (Dkt. No. 78) to raise indefiniteness arguments for two (2) claim terms. (Dkt. No. 107 at 1).