Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cloud Byte LLC v. Dell Inc. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00637 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00637, Dkt. No. 74
Decided
March 28, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion(s)70, 59 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion to Compel Discovery (the “Motion to Compel”) filed by Defendants Dell Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 59.) Also before the Court is Defendants’ Opposed Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Discovery (“Motion for Leave”). (Dkt. No. 70.) Having considered the Motion to Compel and Motion for Leave, the Court finds that they should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Cloud Byte LLC (“Cloud Byte”) acquired the asserted patents from IP Wave Pte. Ltd.