Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Longhorn Automotive Group LLC v. Hyundai Motor Company et al, No. 2:24-cv-00554 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 26, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00554, Dkt. No. 83
Decided
September 26, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 58 MOTION to Dismiss - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) filed by Kia Corporation, Hyundai Motor Company. (Motion(s)58 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant s Hyundai Motor Company’s (“Hyundai”) and Kia Corporation’s (“Kia”) (together, the “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 58). Plaintiff Longhorn Automotive Group LLC (“Longhorn Automotive”) opposes the Motion. ( See Dkt. No. 60). For the following reasons, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED under Rule 12(b)(6) and further ORDERS that Longhorn Automotive be given leave to amend its complaint as noted herein. II.