Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ElectricProtect Corporation v. Zhongshan Kaper Electrical Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00547 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2025)

Denied
Motion to Dismiss Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00547, Dkt. No. 11
Decided
January 3, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court finds that Plaintiff's showing at present falls short of what is necessary to support the extraordinary remedy of alternative service. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 10) is DENIED WITHOUT PR…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Effect Alternative Service (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff ElectricProtect Corporation (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 10.) In the Motion Plaintiff seeks leave to effect alternative service on Defendants Zhongshan Kaper Electrical Co., Ltd. (“Zhongshan Kaper”) and Zhongshan Lianchang Co., Ltd.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error