Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SiOnyx, LLC v. Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00408 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00408, Dkt. No. 18
Decided
August 30, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 9 MOTION to Stay THIS ACTION PENDING FINAL DISPOSITION OF RELATED CLAIMS ASSERTED IN A PROCEEDING BEFORE THE UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Samsung Se…
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay This Action Pending Final Disposition of Related Claims Asserted in a Proceeding Before t he United States International Trade Commission (the “Motion to Stay”) (Dkt. No. 9) and the M otion to Consolidate this Action with Related Action 2:24-CV-00291-JRG (the “Motion to Consolidate”) (Dkt. No. 10) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”).