Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Advanced Coding Technologies LLC v. Google LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00353 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00353, Dkt. No. 47
Decided
December 12, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Google LLC’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 40.) Having considered the Motion, the briefing, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND On May 10, 2024, Plaintiff Advanced Coding Technology (“ACT”) filed this action against Google for infringement of three patents: U.S. Patent No. 8,090,025 (the “’ 025 Patent”), U.S. Patent No.