Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Autoscribe Corporation v. Nuvei Corporation et al, No. 2:24-cv-00325 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2025)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00325, Dkt. No. 68
Decided
April 21, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion(s)45 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Compel Additional Jurisdictional Discovery (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Autoscribe Corp. (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 45.) In the Motion, Plaintiff requests that the Court compel (a) Defendants Nuvei Int’l Grp. Ltd. and Nuvei Ltd. to respond to “the same eight interrogatorie s” that Nuvei Corp. and Nuvei Tech. Corp. have responded to (“Interrogatory Nos. 1-8”), (b) Defendants Nuvei Corp., Nuvei Tech. Corp., Nuvei Ltd., and Nuvei Int’l Grp. Ltd.