DigitalDoors, Inc. v Cathay Bank, No. 2:24-cv-00312 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Cadence Bank previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 18. ) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Reco mmendation recommending denial of Cadence’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 73.) Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 18) is DENIED. v. CADENCE BANK, CIVIL ACTION NO.