Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Four Batons Wireless, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00284 (E.D. Tex. June 11, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00284, Dkt. No. 78
Decided
June 11, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 45 SEALED MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF FOUR BATONS'S TECHNICAL EXPERT DR. MATTHEW SHOEMAKE filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.. (Motion(s)45 terminated)
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff Four Batons’s Technical Expert Dr. Matthew Shoemake (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (together, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 45.) In the Motion, Samsung moves to disqualify Plaintiff Four Batons Wireless, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) expert, Dr. Matthew Shoemake, alleging that the expert is privy to Samsung’s confidential information by virtue of his previous engagements with Samsung. (Id.