Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daedalus Prime LLC v. MediaTek Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00235 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00235, Dkt. No. 52
Decided
March 12, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 14 MOTION to Dismiss IN PART DAEDALUS PRIME LLC'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT filed by MediaTek Inc.. (Motion(s)14 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss in Part Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”) filed by Defendant MediaTek , Inc. (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 14.) Having considered the Motion to Dismiss, related briefing, and relevant authority, the Court finds that the Motion to Dismiss should be and hereby is GRANTED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Daedalus Prime LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) filed this lawsuit against Defendant on April 8, 2024, alleging that Defendant infringed eight U.S. patents. (Dkt. No.