Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Dialect, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 2:24-cv-00207 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00207, Dkt. No. 57
Decided
December 3, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION (Motion(s)26 terminated)
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Dialect, LLC’s Amended Claims of Indirect and Willful Patent Infringement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 26.) Having consi dered the Motion and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED- IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND On March 22, 2024, Plaintiff Dialect, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Defendant. (Dkt. No.