Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tosoh Corporation v. Dental Direkt GmbH, No. 2:24-cv-00138 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2025)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00138, Dkt. No. 81
Decided
December 11, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 67 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION DISCOVERY FROM DEFENDANTS filed by Tosoh Corporation. (Motion(s)67 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendants (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Tosoh Corporation (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 67). In the Motion, Plaintiff moves to compel Defendant Dental Direkt GmbH (“Defendant”) to produce (a) all documents responsive to Interrogatory No . 4 and Request for Production (“RFPs”) Nos. 1, 4, and 9 ; (b) samples of all products encompassed by RFP Nos. 20 and 21; and (c) produce documents responsive to all RFPs regarding D29 Products. (Id. at 3–7).