Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

VirtaMove, Corp. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, No. 2:24-cv-00093 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 16, 2024)

Granted in Part
Motion to Dismiss Marking (§ 287)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00093, Dkt. No. 90
Decided
October 16, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 66 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANT HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY'S RULE 12(b)(6) PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Motion(s)66 termi…
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company’s (“HPE”) Rule 12(b)(6) Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 66.) Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART AND DENIED-IN-PART. I.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case