Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Croga Innovations Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00065 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 14, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00065, Dkt. No. 108
Decided
April 14, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion(s)65 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), Fortine t, Inc. (“Fortinet ”), and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. ( “PAN”) (collectively, “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 65.) Having considered the Motion and the related briefing, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED. 2 I. BACKGROUND In this consolidated action, Plaintiff Croga Innovations Ltd. (“Croga”) filed suit against Cisco, alleging infringement of U.S.