Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Secure Wi-Fi LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2025)

Granted
Motion to Strike Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00047, Dkt. No. 198
Decided
December 23, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion (Dkt. No. 190) should be and hereby is GRANTED
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Samsung’s Attempt to Substantively Change the Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Testimony of Samsung Witness Sinjae Kang Via “Errata” Submitted on the Eve of Trial (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Secure Wi-Fi (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 190.) Having considered the Motion and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On May 20, 2025, Plaintiff took the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of engineer Sinjae Kang on behalf of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case