Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment, Inc. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00029 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00029, Dkt. No. 134
Decided
March 17, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
Inc., AT&T Services Inc., AT&T Communications LLC, AT&T Corp.. (Motion(s)87 terminated)
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue Based on the Parties’ Contractual Forum-Selection Clause, and Alternatively, Motion to Stay Case Pending Arbitration. Dkt. No. 87. AT&T argues that as part of a joint development group between Plaintiff ASSIA and AT&T, the parties agreed to a broad forum selection clause that requires the parties to handle any “claims or counterclaims” between them in the Northern District of California. Id. at 1.