Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00021 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00021, Dkt. No. 93
Decided
December 13, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) Defendants SAP America, Inc. and SAP SE’s (collectively, “Defendants” or “SAP”) Motion for Intra-District Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 22, the “Motion to Transfer”), and (2) Defendants’ Motion to Stay Case Pending Rulings on Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing and Motion to Transfer (Dkt. No. 76, the “Motion to Stay” and with the Motion to Transfer, the “Motions”) .