Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00628 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00628, Dkt. No. 70
Decided
March 27, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER STAYING CASE (Motion(s)46 terminated)
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay (the “Motio n”) filed by Defendants Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas LLC (collectively, “Micron” or “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 46). In the Motion, Micron asks the Court to exercise its discretion to stay this declaratory judgment action pending resolution of its Idaho state-court actions. (Id. at 1.) Having considered the Motion, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED AS MODIFIED. I.