Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd. et al v. SES-imagotag S.A. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00617 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Venue / Transfer Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00617, Dkt. No. 85
Decided
March 31, 2025
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 38 Motion to Dismiss filed by SES-imagotag GmbH, CAPTANA GMBH, 77 Report and Recommendations (Motion(s)77, 38 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants VusionGroup GmbH (f/k/a SES -Imagotag GmbH) and Captana GmbH’s (collectively, “Moving Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2). Docket No. 38. The above-captioned action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation which recommended denying the m otion. Docket No. 77. On March 24, 2025, Moving Defendants filed objections to the Report. Docket No. 81. I.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error