Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Collision Communications, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00587 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 17, 2025)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00587, Dkt. No. 286
Decided
September 17, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 280 Sealed Motion for Leave to Supplement
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Leave to Supplement the Expert Report of Dr. Kowalski (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Collision Communications, Inc. (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 280.) In the Motion, Plaintiff moves for leave to supplement the infringement reports of its technical expert, Dr. Kowalski, in light of the Court’s Supplemental Claim Construction Order (the “Supplemental Order”) (Dkt. No. 269). (Dkt. No. 280.) Having considered the Motion and its related briefing, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that it should be GRANTED.