Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Longitude Licensing Limited v. BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00515 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 4, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00515, Dkt. No. 315
Decided
December 4, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 187 Sealed Motion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Portions of Dr. E. Fred Schubert’s Testimony Regarding Infringement. Dkt. No. 187. The Motion is ripe. See Dkt. Nos. 201, 218. Additionally, the Parties submitted supplemental briefing, see Dkt. Nos. 299, 300, in response to the Court’s order, see Dkt. No. 266. Dr. Schubert is Plaintiffs ’ technical expert, and opines on, inter alia, validity, infringement, use, and benefits of the ’079, ’948, ’093, ’157, ’606, and ’462 Patents. See Op. Rep., Dkt. No. 187-2; First Supp. Rep., Dkt. No. 187-4; Second Supp.