Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Dexcom, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2024)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00473, Dkt. No. 33
Decided
July 25, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Denying and dismissing case (Motion(s)25 terminated)
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant Dexcom, Inc. (“Dexcom”). (Dkt. No. 25.) In the Motion, Dexcom argues that the Asserted Patents claim unpatentable subject matter outside the scope of 35 U.S.C. § 101. Having considered the Motion, related briefing, and relevant authority, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. 1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Symbology”) alleges infringement of U.S.