Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Valve Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00419 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00419, Dkt. No. 64
Decided
April 29, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion(s)57, 56, 58, 45 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (the “Motion to Strike ”) (Dkt. No. 57) and the Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) for Improper Venue (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 55) filed by Defendant Valve Corporation (“Valve”). Also before the Court are the Motion to Expedite Briefing on Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint and Motion to Expedite Briefing on Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (the “Motions to Expedite”) filed by Valve. (Dkt. Nos.