Oura Health Oy et al v. Ultrahuman Healthcare Pvt., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00396 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2024)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Final resolution of ITC Investigation. (Dkt. No. 17.) For the reasons provided below, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART. I. LEGAL STANDARD “The party seeking a stay bears the burden of showing that such a course is appropriate.” Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Flywheel Sports, Inc., No. 218-cv-390-RWS-RSP, 2019 WL 3826051, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2019) (quoting Realtime Data, LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enter. Co., No. 6:16-cv-86-RWS-JDL, 2017 WL 3712916, at *3 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2017) ); accord Landis v. N.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error