Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00379 (E.D. Tex. June 24, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00379, Dkt. No. 313
Decided
June 24, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER- Motion 173
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike the Opinions of Dr. Richard Wesel, filed by Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corp.. Dkt. No. 173. I. BACKGROUND A substantively identical motion was filed in a parallel litigation: Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al , 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP. See Dkt. No. 176 in 2:23- cv- 00352. The Court notes, however, that there is an argument unique to the instant motion related to Roaming Reduction, which will be taken up now. II.