Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

The Research Foundation for The State University of New York et al v. Xiaomi Corporation et al, No. 2:23-cv-00353 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00353, Dkt. No. 74
Decided
March 26, 2025
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 73 Report and Recommendations,, 22 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Zepp Health Corporation, 23 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Zepp Health Corporation, 24 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Zepp Health Corpora…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant Zepp Health Corporation’s Motions to Dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6), and 19(a) & (b). Docket Nos. 22, 23, 24. The United States Magistrate Judge entered a report recommending the motions be denied and finding that Plaintiffs have sufficiently plead personal jurisdiction under Rule 4(k)(2), direct infringement, indirect infringement, and willful infringement. Docket No. 73. The report also found dismissal for failure to join a party to be inappropriate. Id. at 12–13.