Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

FlatFrog Laboratories, AB v. Chemtronics Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00306 (E.D. Tex. June 14, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00306, Dkt. No. 81
Decided
June 14, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 69 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review filed by Chemtronics Co., Ltd. (Motion(s)69 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. (Dkt. No. 69.) For the reasons provided below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff FlatF rog and Defendant Chemtronics are both manufacturer s of large touch screens that Plaintiff contends are covered by the Asserted Patents. (Opp. at 3- 4.) The parties both manufacture these screens for Samsung to integrate into Samsung’s own products.