Iarnach Technologies Ltd. v. AT&T Corp. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00231 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Nokia’s Second Amended Answer for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Iarnach Technologies Ltd. (“Plaintiff” or “Iarnach”). (Dkt. No. 99.) In the Motion, Plaintiff moves to dismiss intervenor Nokia of America Corp.’s (“Nokia”) counterclaims of noninfringement for failing to “allege a case or controversy sufficient to confer jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §2201(a).” ( Id. at 1.) For the following reasons, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. I.