Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Video Solutions Pte. Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00222 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 17, 2025)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00222, Dkt. No. 223
Decided
January 17, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 211 Opposed Motion to Dismiss U.S. Patent No. 8,446,823 (Motion(s)211 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion to Dismiss U.S. Patent No. 8,446,823 (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Video Solutions Pte. Ltd . ( “Plaintiff” or “Video Solutions”) . (Dkt. No. 211.) In the Motion, Video Solutions moves under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) to dismiss Count III (the count relating to the ’823 patent) of the Amended Complaint and Cisco’s corresponding affirmative defenses with respect to Count III as it relates to the ’823 Patent without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 211 at 1 (citing D kt. No. 52 at ¶¶ 51- 62).) Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.