Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

General Access Solutions, Ltd. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 296
Decided
March 25, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 264 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law for Invalidity of the '383 and '477 Patents filed by Ericsson Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Motion(s)264 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Renewed Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant T -Mobile USA, Inc. and Intervenor -Defendant Ericsson Inc. (“Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 264) . In the Motion, Defendants move the Court to enter judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) that the patents asserted at trial are invalid for want of written description. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. BACKGROUND At trial, Plaintiff General Access Solutions, Ltd.