Jawbone Innovations, LLC v. Panasonic Holdings Corporation, No. 2:23-cv-00081 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant HTC Corporation. Case No. 2:23-cv-00077, Dkt. No. 22.1 For the following reasons, Defendant HTC’s Motion should be DENIED without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Jawbone originally filed Case No. 2:23- cv-00077 accusing HTC of direct, indirect, and willful infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,019,091; 7,246,058; 10,779,080; 11,122,357; 8,467,543; 8,503,691; 8,321,213; and 8,326,611 (collectively the “Asserted Patents” ). Case No. 2:23-cv-00077, Dkt. No. 1.