Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Jawbone Innovations, LLC v. HTC Corporation Pursuant TO Court Order, Docket IN Lead Case 2:23CV81, No. 2:23-cv-00077 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00077, Dkt. No. 24
Decided
March 7, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re (22 in 2:23-cv-00077-JRG-RSP) MOTION to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support filed by HTC Corporation
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant HTC Corporation. Case No. 2:23-cv-00077, Dkt. No. 22.1 For the following reasons, Defendant HTC’s Motion should be DENIED without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Jawbone originally filed Case No. 2:23- cv-00077 accusing HTC of direct, indirect, and willful infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,019,091; 7,246,058; 10,779,080; 11,122,357; 8,467,543; 8,503,691; 8,321,213; and 8,326,611 (collectively the “Asserted Patents” ). Case No. 2:23-cv-00077, Dkt. No. 1.