Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC d/b/a Xfinity et al, No. 2:23-cv-00062 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2025)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00062, Dkt. No. 40
Decided
March 13, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER OVERRULING Objections and adopting Report and Recommendations
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the following objections (the “Objections”) filed challenging pretrial rulings issued by Magistrate Judge Payne in the above-captioned Case1: 1. Comcast’s Objections to the Memorandum Order Denying Comcast’s Motion to Strike the Opinions of Dr. Russell W. Mangum III (Dkt. No. 263) 2. Comcast’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne’s Denial of Comcast MIL No. 3 (Dkt. No. 243) 3. Plaintiff Touchstream Technologies, Inc.’s Objection to Ruling On Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al.’s Motion in Limine No. 42 (Dkt. No.