Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Polaris Innovations Limited v. Nanya Technology Corporation, No. 2:23-cv-00044 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00044, Dkt. No. 52
Decided
March 8, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 38 SEALED MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Regarding Affirmative Defense of License filed by NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Nanya Technology Corporation’s (“NTC”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (the “Motion”) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). (Dkt. No. 38.) Having considered the Motion and its briefing, the Court finds that it should be, and hereby is DENIED for the reasons set forth herein. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND POSTURE On February 6, 2023, Plaintiff Polaris Innovations Limited (“Pola ris”) filed a complaint against NTC alleging six counts of patent infringement , one for each Asserted Patent . (Dkt. No.