Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alarm.com Incorporated et al v. Vivint, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00004 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00004, Dkt. No. 91
Decided
September 6, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION to Dismiss Vivint, Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Vivint, Inc
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Vivint, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 19 . The motion is fully briefed. Dkt. No. 31 (“Response”), Dkt. No. 34 (“Reply”), Dkt. No. 38 (“Sur -Reply”). For the following reasons, the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 19) should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Alarm.com Incorporated (“ADC”) and ICN Acquisition, LLC (“ICN”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed suit January 4, 2023, alleging that certain Vivint security system products and services infringe U.S. Patent Nos.