Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Broadphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00001 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2024)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00001, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
July 24, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Motion(s)41 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Dkt. No. 41; Dkt. No. 45 (reply in support). Plaintiff Broadphone LLC has opposed the Motion through a response and supporting sur -reply brief. Dkt. Nos. 44, 46. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED. Considering the instant Order, Samsung’s Unopposed Motion for Hearing is DENIED AS MOOT. Dkt. No. 53. I.